Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement Grass topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council adopts change to grass-and-weeds enforcement; one-notice cut allowed for repeat violations
Summary
Council approved an ordinance that allows the city to cut grass or weeds without additional notice after an initial notice if the vegetation again exceeds the 10-inch standard during the calendar year; aldermen discussed parkway responsibility and charging for county trust lots.
City aldermen voted Aug. 12 to change Springfield’s grass-and-weeds enforcement so that after one formal notice, the city may cut vegetation that regrows beyond 10 inches and assess the cost and fines without issuing a second notice.
Corporation Counsel described the change as streamlining enforcement: after an initial complaint and mailed notice, public works staff may enter and cut overgrown grass or weeds on a property if the problem recurs in the same calendar year; the city will then bill the owner and may pursue administrative-court collection. The ordinance also clarifies the notice form and the city’s ability to treat right-of-way and parkway strips in enforcement actions.
Aldermen praised the move as a way to reduce repeated complaints and to conserve inspector time, but several called for careful limits. Alderman Gregory warned against overreach on parkway maintenance and said the city should be cautious about assessing property owners for work on strips that may contain city trees or other restrictions. “For us to say, ‘we’re gonna make you cut it,’ then we need to look at how we view that section,” Gregory said.
Other councilmembers said the change will reduce labor demands on inspectors who currently reissue notices and then follow up repeatedly. Alderman Donlon and others asked that the city charge county-trust lots and other repeat problem parcels rather than absorb the cost.
The council approved the ordinance on a voice vote and several aldermen asked to be added as cosponsors. The ordinance is intended to clarify responsibilities, reduce repeat enforcement trips and speed abatement of public-health nuisances, though aldermen asked staff to monitor implementation and report back on any unintended effects in boulevards or rights-of-way.
