Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the New Construction Design topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board urges simplification, material consistency on 335 Southside Avenue new home
Summary
Architectural reviewers flagged mismatches between plans and elevations, suggested simplifying the front elevation and reconsidering the garage placement for a new two-story speculative home at 335 Southside Avenue.
Get email alerts on the New Construction Design topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Members of the Webster Groves Architectural Review Board critiqued the design and documentation for a proposed two-story, new-construction home at 335 Southside Avenue, citing plan/elevation discrepancies and a need to simplify materials and roof forms so the house better fits the neighborhood context.
Board members noted specific discrepancies between plan and elevation drawings: windows shown as 9 feet wide on the floor plan appear as about 5 feet on the elevation, and a mudroom window appears on the elevation but not on the plan. Reviewers also raised concerns about a tall brick element on the front elevation that makes the façade look unbalanced and suggested simplifying materials and removing some extraneous headers so the small elevation reads as a cohesive composition.
Separately, board members questioned the garage placement and driveway geometry. One member observed the design “is barely meeting the 22-foot turnaround requirement,” and suggested aligning the garage more directly with the driveway to improve functionality. The applicant acknowledged the comment and said the current layout intentionally trades a square backyard for a longer rectangular yard.
The board made numerous advisory suggestions — simplifying roof and porch detailing, aligning window head heights with door heads, rethinking the tall brick massing, and ensuring plans and elevations match — and asked the applicant to revise and resubmit. No formal approval or denial was recorded; the board treated the review as a substantive design review with requested revisions.

