Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Window Alteration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Architectural board approves window replacement at 1235 South Elm with option to retain Chicago‑style proportions

5737386 · February 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved a single-frame replacement for a three-part front window at 1235 South Elm Avenue, permitting the owner the option to preserve the existing Chicago‑style window proportions and to use casements rather than a slider.

The Webster Groves Architectural Review Board approved a window replacement at 1235 South Elm Avenue, allowing the owner discretion to preserve the existing Chicago‑style window proportions and to replace side double-hung units with casements.

Board members noted the house’s existing front configuration—two double-hung windows flanking a central picture window—constitutes a Chicago-style composition that contributes to the home’s character. One board member said the Chicago-style arrangement “is very much in keeping with the style of your house” and regretted losing its heavier mullions. The homeowner explained the plan was to replace three units with a single fixed picture window plus sliding sash for efficiency and to fix an existing window with a broken seal.

A board member suggested the owner consider casements rather than a slider to avoid track maintenance issues; another recommended maintaining a heavier central mullion if the owner does not retain the meeting rail provided by double-hung units. The motion that passed approved the application “as submitted with the understanding that the owner may, at their option, maintain the proportions of the existing Chicago window and change out the double hung portions for casements and maintain the fixed picture window.” The motion passed on a voice vote recorded as three ayes and one opposed.

The board did not cite any code or statute during the discussion. Staff or the applicant should confirm final sash choice on permit drawings if the owner elects the casement option.