Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the District Office Supplies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Legislative Council declines one-off district-office banner, directs staff to propose per-office supplies budget
Summary
Council discussed a $500 banner request for a shared district office and declined to approve the individual purchase pending a proposed supplies budget each district office can use at its discretion.
Get email alerts on the District Office Supplies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Legislative Council declined to approve a one-time $500 banner purchase for a shared district office and directed staff to develop a supplies budget for district offices that would allow offices to buy incidental items with local discretion.
The item arose under Legislative Council Policy 27, which charges council service with supplying district offices with necessary equipment and supplies but refers "unreasonable or extraordinary" requests to the council for consideration. Council staff reported a State Printing quote of about $500 for the banner, described as signage to advertise an office open house. Several members said that such a purchase appears to fall outside routine operational supplies and could set a precedent.
Council guidance and next steps: members said they preferred to allow each district office an allocated supplies budget that offices could use at their discretion — for example, allowing offices to spend their full allocation on a one-time banner while accepting that would exhaust their supply funds for the year. Council staff said they are working on a proposed budget framework for incidental supplies and will bring those recommendations back to the council for approval.
Discussion highlights: the council director noted that work is underway to finalize district office budgets for incidental supplies. Madam Pro Tem said the banner request felt "beyond what we consider everyday office supplies" and suggested offices could chip in privately for special items. Other members urged caution about a slippery slope of requests for advertising or publicity items and recommended a purchase threshold or an annual supplies allocation as a clearer rule.
Outcome: no formal roll-call vote was recorded; the council did not approve the single banner request and instead asked staff to draft a supplies-budget policy and thresholds for council consideration.
