Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Senate Bill 355 would codify 2013 executive order on capital outlay oversight into statute

March 01, 2025 | Tax, Business and Transportation, Senate, Committees, Legislative, New Mexico


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Senate Bill 355 would codify 2013 executive order on capital outlay oversight into statute
Senate Bill 355 would codify oversight procedures that were established by a 2013 executive order concerning management and disbursement of capital outlay funds, creating a Public Finance Accountability Act that sets statutory criteria for releasing capital outlay and special appropriations tied to audit compliance.

Sen. Peter Wirth, sponsor of SB355, told the committee an attorney general opinion issued after the 2013 executive order had concluded the order was unconstitutional as written, and that the current practice gives the executive branch broad authority. “We need to do something in statute, and that's what this proposes to do, is to codify the oversight,” Wirth said.

Emily Oster, finance director for the City of Santa Fe, spoke in support and described work to catch up the city’s audits. Committee members asked about consequences and oversight when audit findings show material weaknesses or deficiencies. Wirth and staff said a grantee that documents a material weakness must prepare an actionable plan and would have two fiscal years to remedy those findings; if unremedied, a fiscal agent can be appointed to manage funds.

Committee deliberations: Sponsors said the statutory framework is intended to provide guardrails and a clear process for DFA (Department of Finance and Administration) and the state auditor when audits are missing or show deficiencies, and to give local governments a path to resolve findings rather than an indefinite freeze of funds based solely on executive discretion.

Vote: Senator Sherr moved a due-pass recommendation; Senator Jadimio seconded. The committee approved the due-pass motion by show of hands with no recorded opposition. Testimony included two in-room supporters and one online participant whose position was recorded as opposition.

Next steps: Sponsors said they expect continued discussions with DFA and the state auditor as the bill proceeds.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Mexico articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI