Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Police Training Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee tables Senate Bill 50 after wide debate over police training, council structure and funding
Summary
Senate Bill 50 — a broad rewrite of police training, certification board composition and retention incentives for telecommunicators — drew lengthy public comment and law enforcement opposition; the committee ultimately voted to table the substitute pending further stakeholder work.
Senate Bill 50, a sweeping proposal to modernize law-enforcement training and adjust the composition of the law enforcement standards and training council, prompted extended testimony from advocates, law enforcement leaders and state agencies before the committee voted to table the substitute.
Sponsor summary: Senator Maestas (presenting the substitute) said the bill aims to "revamp and modernize police training and curriculum" and to add telecommunicators to the retention fund while attempting not to reduce funds currently available to officers. He said the substitute removes some repetitive statutory mandates and shifts more curricular authority to the training council and certifying bodies so academies can adopt modern adult-education techniques. Maestas said the bill also narrows and clarifies membership language on the training council and changes the chair requirement from a retired district court judge to "an attorney with judicial experience."
Public comment and opposition: Supporters included Rachel Feldman of Indivisible SOS Santa Fe (who also serves as an appointed member of the standards and training council) and Chris Michelis of the NAACP, both urging updates to curricula and credentialing. Several chiefs, the New Mexico State Police and the Department of Public Safety opposed the bill in its present form, citing a lack of early engagement with local agencies, concerns about reduced law enforcement representation on the council, potential fiscal impacts on smaller academies, and the bill’s scope and drafting. Secretary Jason Bowie of the Department of Public Safety told the committee he and his agency had limited time to review the draft and preferred longer stakeholder work.
Committee action: After questions and extended debate, a motion to table the bill passed on a roll-call vote; senators explained they wanted more stakeholder engagement and a clearer statutory draft before moving forward.
Why it matters: The substitute touches on recruitment and retention, training content and governance of the state training council; opponents warned changes could reduce local input and impose administrative burdens on smaller agencies. Supporters argued the proposal would modernize training, improve officer performance and professionalize the field.
Next steps: The sponsor said he would consult further with stakeholders and seek a revised draft (0.4) to address concerns; the bill was tabled and will remain under committee consideration.
