Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cannabis Local Moratorium topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Torrance County officials seek temporary pause on cannabis grow permits; committee hears mixed views
Summary
Senate Bill 152 would allow a county commission to request a temporary pause—up to two years—on cannabis grow permits from the Cannabis Control Division. Torrance County officials testified about concentrated grow operations and local impacts; senators raised questions about statutory authority and statewide regulation.
Senator Stefaniek presented Senate Bill 152, a proposal that would let a county commission pass a resolution and petition the Cannabis Control Division (CCD) to pause issuance of cannabis grow permits in that county for up to two years.
Jordan Barela, Torrance County manager, and Commissioner Linda Jaramillo described what they said is a rapid influx of grow and manufacturing licenses in their county. Barela said CCD records show “roughly 32 production and manufacturing cannabis licenses in the county,” which he said amounts to about one license per 488 residents and has created local problems including road wear, odor, light pollution, litter affecting livestock and labor‑encampment concerns.
Torrance County officials and supporters said the pause would give counties breathing room to address land‑use, enforcement and community impacts; the county commission passed a resolution supporting the bill.
Senators and witnesses debated whether the proposed pause conflicts with language in the Cannabis Regulation Act (CRA) that limits local prohibition. Senator Duhigg and others questioned whether the bill gives the CCD legal authority to grant a moratorium; the fiscal–impact report (FIR) from the CCD flagged concerns about the agency’s timetable, legal challenges and the absence of explicit approval criteria.
Several senators said the state’s approach of unlimited licensure has produced market and enforcement problems. Senator Maestas said unlimited licenses reduced license value and removed a structural incentive for self‑policing; he urged broader statutory reform rather than a piecemeal moratorium. Senator O’Malley said she understood Torrance County’s problems and planned to support the petition concept as a local tool.
Committee discussion touched on enforcement capacity, the need to address retail and vertical licensure, and whether the CCD currently has the authority to pause licensing absent explicit statutory delegation. Some senators said they doubted the division could lawfully deny or grant petitions without a statutory grant of authority.
No final committee vote on the bill is recorded in the transcript. The committee heard testimony for and against the concept, including questions about whether a county‑level pause would address retail saturation, enforcement failures, or simply shift problems elsewhere.
