Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate Judiciary committee advances committee substitute for omnibus crime bill
Summary
The Senate Judiciary Committee met on an unusual Tuesday evening and approved a committee substitute for Senate Bill 510, an omnibus criminal law package that touches on statutes of limitation, human trafficking, penalties for sexual exploitation of children, operations described as “stash houses,” and provisions addressing youthful offenders and competency evaluations.
The Senate Judiciary Committee met on an unusual Tuesday evening and approved a committee substitute for Senate Bill 510, an omnibus criminal law package that touches on statutes of limitation, human trafficking, penalties for sexual exploitation of children, operations described as “stash houses,” and provisions addressing youthful offenders and competency evaluations.
Senator Sherry, who presented the original bill, described its scope as broad: the measure "is an omnibus crime package bill that deals with the time that statute of limitations and when you could deal with human trafficking, increases penalties for [sexual] exploitation of children, stash houses of crime, and it addresses youthful offenders as well as competency in evaluation before you go to court," and then stood for questions.
Committee members discussed a proposed committee substitute in place of the original bill. One senator told the panel that the substitute "is the language … that we passed earlier, but even better. This is the language that we discussed in Senate Bill 166, which changes the definitions of harm to self and harm to others. It incorporates the original bill 166, the amendments that we did in this committee, and also an amendment that was proposed by the ACLU, to capture someone that has suicidal ideation." That explanation tied portions of the substitute to earlier work on SB 166 and to an amendment from the ACLU, according to the record.
Senator Wood moved the committee action to reject passage of the original Senate Bill 510 and to pass the Senate Judiciary Committee substitute for Senate Bill 510. The committee took the motion by voice; the chair asked, "Is there any objection to the do‑pass motion?" and, after receiving none, announced that the substitute would receive a do‑pass recommendation from the committee.
The meeting record shows no roll‑call tally or recorded no votes; the chair characterized the outcome as approved with no objections. The committee noted the unusual scheduling for the session (held on a Tuesday) and said other items on the published agenda would be heard on the committee's regular meeting night.
The committee did not record additional formal directions to staff or specify next‑step deadlines on the substitute in the transcript excerpt. The record closes with the chair thanking members and noting future meeting dates.
