Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Juvenile Justice Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee pares juvenile funding pilot and removes stipend pilot; expands sentencing discretion for juvenile commitments
Summary
House Bill 255, initially drafted by the Sentencing Commission to expand eligibility for juvenile community corrections funding and a stipend pilot, was amended by the Senate Judiciary Committee to strike a stipend pilot (section 12) and to provide judges clearer sentencing discretion and program priorities.
Get email alerts on the Juvenile Justice Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senator (sponsor) explained House Bill 255 began as a Sentencing Commission's bill to change eligibility language so juvenile community corrections funds could be used for a broader population ("delinquent children or youthful offenders") and to expand an age definition of "youth" up to 26 for program eligibility. The house amended bill originally also added a pilot stipend (section 12) to provide per-diem stipends to eligible youth participating in programs.
Committee debate included public testimony from a juvenile-justice advocate supporting upstream investment and from the ACLU and a Sentencing Commission member opposing the bill's later additions. The ACLU's written opposition said expanding adult sentencing for youth would be counterproductive and harmful; the Sentencing Commission member said the final version diverged from the commission's consensus and lacked transparent process.
Sponsor Senator Maestas (and other supporters) offered an amendment (3.4/0.4 in committee discussion) that primarily struck section 12 (the stipend pilot) after hearing concerns from members and stakeholders; the amendment also adjusted sentencing language to change statutory phrasing from "no more than" to "up to" to give judges discretion over short- and long-term commitments (for example, allowing 0 to 9 months rather than a mandatory 9-month floor). The committee also modified grant-application priority language to list eligible programs rather than create strict priority tiers.
After public comment and internal debate, committee adopted the amendment removing the stipend pilot and other cleanup language and voted to recommend HB255 pass as amended.
