Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Assistance Tanf topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lawmakers consider changes to TANF to blunt the "cliff effect" for families
Summary
Senate Bill 189, proposing three changes to New Mexico's TANF and Education Works programs—allowing GED/vocational training, protecting children's portion during parental sanctions, and raising allowable savings—advanced from committee but drew questions about metrics, funding and whether the changes go far enough to improve employment outcomes.
Senate Bill 189, a committee substitute aimed at reducing the so-called "cliff effect" for families transitioning off Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), won a due-pass recommendation but prompted detailed questioning about costs, program metrics and long-term outcomes.
Sponsor Senator Stefanik said the bill makes three targeted changes: allow parents on TANF to pursue a high-school diploma (GED) or vocational certificate as qualifying activities (not just two- or four-year degrees); permit the children's portion of the monthly TANF payment to continue while a sanctioned parent works with caseworkers to resolve compliance issues; and increase allowable savings so families can build small reserves before exit.
Kira Ochoa, deputy cabinet secretary for the Health Care Authority, and cabinet secretary Carrie Armijo testified in support and described the changes as practical steps that would allow families to pursue realistic education and training paths, avoid rapid exclusion from benefits, and accumulate modest savings to smooth exits from assistance. Armijo said the goal is to create "stairs" rather than a cliff for families making progress.
The committee saw data cited in testimony: TANF currently serves about 7,714 households or 20,354 New Mexicans (5,698 adults and 14,656 children). Sponsors estimated the three changes together could positively affect an additional 15,000 New Mexicans (figures in testimony broke that into approximate beneficiaries by change: 300 children for the vocational allowance, 5,405 children aided by sanction reforms, and 8,666 children aided by expanded savings rules).
Committee questioning focused on whether the package would materially improve long-term exits to employment and public-safety considerations about work incentives. Senator Scott asked how the bill would solve the problem of parents who choose lower-hour or lower-wage jobs that do not cover living costs once benefits are reduced; witnesses said expanded training access, longer sanction remediation periods and savings tools are incremental improvements and that broader or higher monthly benefits would require additional appropriations and federal-block-grant allocations.
Senator Block urged sponsors to refine performance metrics and long-term outcomes before floor consideration and offered to work with staff; supporters said they would continue to provide cost and outcomes data. The committee recorded a due-pass recommendation (reported as 5 yes, 4 no) and sent the bill to the next committee for fiscal review.
