Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill to require posting settlement terms and create loss‑prevention reviews, 9-0
Summary
A bill that would require state agencies to post settlement terms on the Sunshine Portal and create loss‑prevention review teams for incidents involving death, serious injury or large losses cleared a Senate committee on a unanimous 9-0 vote.
A bill to increase transparency for state settlement agreements and to require after‑action loss‑prevention reviews advanced from committee with a unanimous voice and roll-call endorsement.
Sponsor remarks described three main components: expanding Sunshine Portal posting requirements to include settlement terms handled outside the Risk Management Division, defining administrative updates and triggering loss‑prevention review teams when deaths, serious injuries or substantial losses are alleged, and requiring an annual report to the Legislature on review-team activities.
Senator Ramos and other supporters said the bill was modeled on Washington state law. The measure defines “substantial losses” as amounts over $250,000 or as identified by the RMD director, and it would require the Risk Management Division to appoint a loss‑prevention review team after incidents that meet the statutory trigger, compile an incident report and require written responses from agency heads to review findings and recommendations.
Caitlin (presenter) and trial attorney Dusty Harvey testified in support, saying public reporting would help prevent future harm. Committee members asked about applicability to medical‑malpractice claims, HIPAA-protected information and disclosure of attorney identities. Supporters said the bill applies to claims against state agencies and that existing privacy laws, including HIPAA, would still be respected; they noted settlement reporting on the Sunshine Portal has in practice already included attorneys’ names and settlement amounts in many cases.
Senator Lanier moved the committee do‑pass recommendation; Senator Keel seconded. A roll call recorded nine yes votes and no no votes. The clerk announced a “do pass 9 to 0.” The bill will proceed with the committee’s endorsement.
Proponents said the bill aims to improve transparency and require agencies to analyze major incidents to prevent similar losses in the future.
