Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Campus Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee reports substitute narrowing statewide anti‑hazing bill to higher education
Summary
The Senate Education Committee adopted a substitute for Senate Bill 10 that focuses the anti‑hazing reporting, prevention and transparency requirements on public and private postsecondary institutions. The substitute aligns some reporting with federal requirements (Clery Act) and passed the committee on a due‑pass vote.
Senate Bill 10, an anti‑hazing measure, was revised in committee and the Senate Education Committee reported a substitute that narrows the bill’s scope to postsecondary institutions. The revised substitute requires public and private higher‑education institutions to adopt research‑based prevention programs, publish anti‑hazing policies and make specified reports; it aligns certain reporting expectations with existing federal law (Clery Act) and the federal Stop Campus Hazing Act.
Sponsor Senator Pope said the substitute removes K‑12 language and focuses the statute on colleges and universities. Committee discussion covered the relationship between the state requirements and existing federal reporting obligations, penalties for failure to report and institutional responsibilities for remediation. Senator Pope said the bill was revised to avoid duplicative reporting and to match federal terminology where appropriate.
Committee members asked whether the substitute creates new administrative burdens or costs for institutions. Senator Pope said institutions already maintain reporting systems for related incidents (sexual assault, harassment) and HED will receive an annual report under the substitute; HED’s role was discussed as an oversight and transparency mechanism. Some senators said they want stronger enforcement language that would allow HED to intervene if an institution fails to remediate persistent problems; sponsor and committee members noted that the substitute does not prescribe HED enforcement steps but that oversight could be clarified in later amendments.
Vote and next steps: The committee recorded a due‑pass recommendation for the substitute on a roll call. Committee members asked sponsors to consider clarifying enforcement authority and to ensure the substitute aligns with federal reporting law where penalties exist.
Ending: The committee advanced a higher‑education‑focused anti‑hazing substitute with a due‑pass recommendation and flagged enforcement, reporting and compliance language for subsequent drafting.
