Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Health Telehealth topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee advances psychology compact to expand telehealth and interstate practice

5695827 · March 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House Judiciary Committee voted to give House Bill 242 a "do pass" recommendation. The bill would enable New Mexico to join the psychology interstate compact to expand telehealth access and allow compact psychologists limited in‑state practice days, supporters said.

The House Judiciary Committee voted to recommend "do pass" on House Bill 242, which would authorize New Mexico to join an interstate compact for psychology licensure that supporters say will increase telehealth access and expand the mental‑health workforce.

Representative Paul (sponsor) told the committee the compact is one of several interstate agreements aimed at increasing the availability of health professionals to New Mexicans. The compact would eliminate separate licensing hurdles for psychologists practicing in multiple states and includes a provision authorizing compact psychologists to practice physically in state for up to 30 days per year.

Supporters included JD Bullington of the Greater Albuquerque Chamber of Commerce, Otiamba (advocacy director) for AARP New Mexico, Marcus Luhan of Think New Mexico, and Dr. Bronwyn Nieser presenting for NAMI New Mexico; speakers emphasized telehealth access in rural areas, continuity of care and that dozens of other states have already approved similar compacts. Dr. Nieser said the compact would provide legal guidelines and continuity for psychology practice and noted the bill aligns with experienced practice standards.

The committee voted on a motion for "do pass" and the chair announced a "do pass" recommendation. Committee members asked about Supreme Court review and administrative details; sponsor said the court had previously reviewed similar compacts and the bill had no technical amendments outstanding.

The compact will now move forward with the committee’s recommendation; proponents said it is a policy tool to help attract and retain mental‑health professionals and improve access to care across the state.