Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pharmaceuticals topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee advances bill to remove cost sharing for cholesterol-lowering drugs

5695218 · March 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A committee substitute for Senate Bill 443, which would eliminate patient cost sharing for cholesterol-lowering medications (statins and, for a small share, PCSK9 inhibitors), received a due-pass recommendation 7–3. Sponsor argued generics and newer agents now have low costs; members raised concerns about estimated premium impacts.

The committee gave a due-pass recommendation to the double committee substitute for Senate Bill 443 by a 7–3 recorded vote. The measure would eliminate cost sharing for cholesterol-lowering drugs, including generic statins and, for the small percentage of patients not managed by statins, second-line agents such as PCSK9 inhibitors.

Senator Hickey outlined clinical and economic rationale: statins are inexpensive generics (sponsor referenced roughly 50 cents per day), reduce LDL for most patients and the higher-cost second-line agents have dropped substantially in price in recent years. "About 1 to 2 percent of patients are unresponsive or have complications to the statins and therefore require the second line drug," the sponsor said, adding that competition has reduced PCSK9 costs to about $100 per month in some cases.

Representative Nicole Chavez and others asked questions about the distribution of formulary tiers and how many patients would be affected; the sponsor cited an IBAC comment that the second-line population is small (about 1–2 percent). Representative Chavez expressed concern about premium impacts and cited uncertainty around an estimate of increased premiums.

Representative E. Chavez moved the due-pass recommendation and Representative Frei seconded. The committee recorded a 7–3 roll-call vote in favor.

Supporters framed the measure as preventive spending that reduces cardiovascular events; critics on the committee asked for fiscal clarity on premium impacts and utilization.