Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Workplace Protections Nursing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House committee advances bill adding anti‑retaliation checkpoint for nurses using Safe Harbor
Summary
The House Health & Human Services Committee voted 8-0 to give House Bill 465 a 'do pass' recommendation after sponsors said the bill adds a post‑event check to the 2019 Safe Harbor law to confirm no retaliation or bullying occurred when nurses invoke Safe Harbor protections.
Representative Torres Velasquez, sponsor of House Bill 465, told the House Health & Human Services Committee on Monday that the bill adds a narrowly focused protection to the 2019 Safe Harbor Act for nurses who report patient‑safety concerns.
"This is a very simple bill," Torres Velasquez said, describing the change as an added checkpoint for investigations that would ask whether a nurse who invoked Safe Harbor experienced any perceived retaliation. "...we added ...bullying as part of retaliation that it's not okay."
The measure directs the reviewing committee to ask the nurse who invoked Safe Harbor whether there was any retaliation and to clarify that health‑care facility personnel — not just the facility itself — cannot retaliate. Jason Blumer, vice president of the New Mexico Nurses Association and a member of the original Safe Harbor task force, testified in support. Gloria Doherty, a nurse practitioner with 35 years in nursing, said: "Safe Harbor is a great protection for patients and nurses to make sure that their assignments are safe."
Representative Jones and Representative Kates asked sponsors whether the retaliation problem was widespread and what the bill specifically adds. Torres Velasquez said the change was prompted by constituent reports and that the bill formalizes a follow‑up communication so that problems that have occurred can be identified and addressed. Kates pressed staff to point to the bill text on page 3 describing the added checkpoint and the explicit inclusion of bullying in the definition of retaliation.
A motion for a "do pass" recommendation was made by Representative Anaya and seconded by Representative Kates. The committee recorded a unanimous committee recommendation: "do pass" by an 8-0 tally. The committee did not discuss separate enforcement penalties in the hearing; sponsors described the change as an investigatory/checkpoint addition rather than a new private‑right‑of‑action.
The bill will proceed from committee with the committee's due‑pass recommendation; further action and any amendments will occur in subsequent floor and committee stages.
Ending: The committee chair said the bill would advance; no additional implementation schedule was specified during the hearing.
