Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Medicaid Reimbursement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House panel advances bill letting state contractors, Medicaid providers request mid‑contract rate reviews after benefit changes
Summary
The House Health and Human Services Committee gave HB119 a do‑pass recommendation as amended after testimony from Medicaid providers and advocacy groups urging a formal process for requesting rate adjustments when the Legislature raises benefits or wages.
Representative Cates, sponsor of House Bill 119, told the House Health and Human Services Committee the measure would allow state contractors and Medicaid providers to request a mid‑contract rate adjustment when the Legislature changes wages or employer benefits such as paid family and medical leave.
The bill aims to mirror a feature of federal contracting known as the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), which lets contractors submit requests for rate adjustments when prevailing wages or benefits change during a contract term. “When you are a Medicaid provider … the margins are so tiny that this can really be devastating,” Representative Cates said during the committee hearing.
Supporters told the committee that many Medicaid and developmental disability waiver providers are effectively “price takers” who cannot renegotiate rates midterm. Jim Copeland, executive director of the Association of Developmental Disabilities Community Providers, told members that New Mexico DD waiver providers are paid rates set through the state and approved by CMS and “sometimes those services don't cover the total cost of providing the service.” Vicente Vargas of the New Mexico Healthcare Association and New Mexico Center for Assisted Living and Dan Najjar of Ambercare made similar points, saying providers need a clear, documented process to ask for rate changes when the Legislature increases costs.
Under the bill, a state contractor would have 45 days after a legislatively enacted benefit change is signed by the governor to submit a written request to the state agency that manages its contract. For Medicaid providers, the measure would require the responsible state agency to file a formal rate change request with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) reflecting the legislative change. Representative Cates noted the bill “does not mandate that the state must pay this request,” but requires the state to make the request to CMS so that federal approval may be obtained.
Committee members questioned whether the bill leaves too much discretion to state agencies or regulatory bodies. Representative Martinez asked why the measure relied on agencies and rulemaking rather than statutory mandates; Cates and witnesses said the bill was drafted to avoid obligating future appropriations and to preserve the state's ability to decline a requested increase. In response to concerns about potential abuse, Cates said the process mirrors the federal FAR approach and that CMS retains authority to accept or deny requests.
The committee adopted a language amendment described by the sponsor as a cleanup to standardize statutory references and moved HB119 as amended out of committee on a 7‑to‑2 vote. The transcript records committee members Representative Martinez and Representative Sena Cortez voting no; the committee chair announced the due pass as amended.
The bill’s supporters urged follow‑up work to ensure the Health Care Authority and other relevant agencies implement a timely, documented process so providers can seek relief when legislatively required benefit costs change.
Looking ahead, HB119 will proceed to the next committee for further consideration, where members may examine the amendment language, implementation timelines and budgetary impacts more closely.
