Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice Habitual Status topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate Judiciary advances SB 189 after striking court-made habitual-status language
Summary
The Senate Judiciary Committee adopted two amendments to Senate Bill 189 and sent the amended bill to the Committee on Appropriations by a 6-1 vote after removing a statutory provision tied to habitual-criminal status and discussing recent court decisions.
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice Habitual Status topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Senate Judiciary Committee voted to advance Senate Bill 189 as amended to the Committee on Appropriations on a 6-1 vote, after adopting two committee amendments that remove a provision governing how habitual-criminal status is determined.
Committee members and bill proponents told the committee that recent case law requires careful changes to the statute. Sponsors and committee members said the section in question has not been used locally to their knowledge and raised fairness and double-jeopardy concerns; they agreed to strike it from the statute and pursue further work in the interim.
Sponsor remarks framed the changes as a response to recent court direction. Senator Snyder, who led the conversation on the bill, said the committee had consulted with the state public defender and district attorneys and that the challenged provision could raise double jeopardy and fairness issues. "I take full responsibility for the confusion on the calendar today," Snyder said, and described the committee's solution: remove the disputed section entirely from the bill and the statute. He added that the Colorado Supreme Court has heard oral argument in a related case, and that the committee's approach was an improvement though not a complete answer for public defenders.
The committee's vice chair emphasized the constitutional and procedural stakes of how habitual findings are characterized, citing earlier U.S. Supreme Court decisions such as Blakely and Apprendi in explaining why jury determination of certain elements is important to preserve procedural protections. The vice chair said the committee should not rely on minimal constitutional interpretations when legislative grace could allow stronger procedural safeguards.
Committee members adopted amendment L1 first and then L2, each without recorded opposition. After closing remarks and brief additional discussion about future interim work and the pending court decision, a member moved the bill to the Committee on Appropriations with a favorable recommendation. The measure passed the committee on a vote of 6 to 1.
Committee discussion noted the need for further legislative attention to Colorado's habitual-offender framework and recognized that future changes could be needed depending on the forthcoming judicial decision.
The amended SB 189 will proceed to the Committee on Appropriations for further consideration.
