Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Disability Insurance Mental Health topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Industry group warns mental-health parity bill for disability coverage could raise premiums; advocates press for parity

5570885 · May 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Joint Committee on Financial Services heard competing views on Senate Bill 780, which would prohibit time limitations on disability benefits for behavioral-health disorders when those limits do not apply to physical disorders. Insurance advisers warned of higher costs and loss of consumer choice; advocates said parity improves access to care.

Senate Bill 780, which would prohibit short- and long-term disability plans from imposing shorter benefit periods for behavioral-health disorders than for physical disorders, drew sharply different testimony before the Joint Committee on Financial Services.

Matthew Berard, a volunteer with NAIFA Massachusetts and an insurance brokerage director, told the committee that while the bill’s intention is "well meaning," a statutory mandate would eliminate consumer choice and increase premiums. "Actuarially, the cost ... to eliminate the choice for mental and nervous limitations equates to a potential increase of approximately 12 to 20%," Berard said, adding that many individual policies and group plans currently offer a 24-month limitation on mental-health claims as a lower-cost option.

Supporters of parity argued the bill would correct unequal treatment and that some plans currently discriminate against claimants with behavioral-health diagnoses. Senator testimony and witnesses stressed parity’s role in removing barriers to care; proponents also pointed to model language from the National Council of Insurance Legislators and said similar protections have been adopted in other states.

The committee took testimony; no vote was recorded. The record includes written materials for further analysis of actuarial impacts and contract enforceability for existing, noncancellable individual disability policies.