Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Police And Fire Pension topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund: leaders say long legacy underfunding and unchanged employer rates strain fund

5552506 · April 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A representative of the Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund told committee members the fund is about 70% funded, that historical underfunding and unchanged employer contribution rates have left the fund strained, and that health coverage changes reduced volatility in retiree health costs.

A representative speaking for the Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund told the House Public Insurance and Pensions Committee that OP&F is roughly 70% funded and faces a long history of underfunding and employer contribution rates that have not adjusted to meet liabilities.

The presenter — addressed during the hearing as “Mary Beth” — said OP&F began in 1965 by consolidating more than 450 municipal plans and inheriting significant liabilities with relatively few assets, which has left a persistent funding gap. “Despite that remarkably with the excellent stewardship of the trustees, the investment staff, and the sacrifices of police and fire members… OP and F is about 70% funded,” the speaker said.

Nut graf: OP&F officials said the combination of an initial underfunding at consolidation, a long period without employer contribution increases, and benefit and market shocks required benefit reductions during earlier reform; the fund’s biggest policy pressure remains employer rate equalization and COLA affordability.

The presenter told the committee OP&F’s employer rates have not changed in about 40 years and cited employer contribution levels (19.5% for police, 24% for fire under the historical structure) as insufficient relative to other covered systems. The fund has a large retiree population relative to actives, with about 31,000 active members and 23,000 retirees (plus roughly 7,000 beneficiaries). The speaker said OP&F’s health‑stabilization actions — including moving to an HRA model and not allowing stipend rollover for reemployed retirees — cut health care volatility from prior levels to an annual range nearer $60–70 million.

Committee members asked about the active-to-retiree ratio and how COLA and retirement age interact with funding. The OP&F presenter said average retirement age has risen (average retiree now about 54) and noted COLA is capped at 3% and often delayed because of affordability. The presenter told members OP&F’s funding period is under the statutory 30‑year threshold but said correcting the legacy underfunding will require action, including potential employer rate changes.