Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council pauses Maple Grove South shade structure to consider larger playground shading plan
Summary
After debate over value and placement, the council directed staff to return with options to shade both the picnic area and adjacent playground at Maple Grove South Park rather than approve a 20x20 shade sail immediately. The council continued action to July 14 to allow the parks subcommittee and staff to weigh in.
Councilmembers delayed awarding a contract to install a 20-by-20 shade sail over a picnic area at Maple Grove South Park and instead directed staff to return with options to shade the picnic area and the neighboring playground together.
Councilmember David Burke—who removed the item from the consent calendar—argued the current proposal, a replacement for a smaller existing structure, would buy little shade for about $80,000 and suggested combining playground and picnic shade to reduce cost per square foot and increase usefulness. He provided photographic examples showing picnic tables only partially shaded during midday. (David Burke, Councilmember.)
Public works staff and other councilmembers cautioned that larger or differently designed shade installations could conflict with future playground replacement plans and that design and bidding for a larger scope would require designer engagement and could take three to four months or longer. Nick (Public Works) said the current design was simple and ready to bid; expanding scope would require a new design and could defer other projects. (Public Works Director: Nick.)
Councilmember Pete and others said they preferred to await recommendations from a parks ad hoc subcommittee and the Recreation and Community Services Commission; Councilmember Burke pressed for staff to develop shading options now so the city could be prepared once the subcommittee reports in July. The council ultimately voted unanimously to continue the item to the July 14 meeting to incorporate the subcommittee’s input and give staff time to return with revised options. (Motion to continue carried unanimously.)
Why it matters: the council sought to balance immediate shade needs for park users with prudent design, budget efficiency and coordination with planned playground replacements. The delay aims to produce a larger, potentially more cost‑effective shading solution and avoid designs that constrain future playground upgrades.
What’s next: staff will consult the parks subcommittee and Recreation Commission, revisit designs that could shade both the picnic area and playground without unduly limiting future playground replacements, and return to the council on or before July 14 with options and cost estimates.
