Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks And Facilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Teton County officials discuss fairgrounds revenue, master plan and funding options
Summary
County officials discussed the fairgrounds’ mixed revenue sources, underpriced rentals, master plan and possible use of impact fees and other funds to support building improvements.
Get email alerts on the Parks And Facilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Teton County commissioners and staff reviewed the fairgrounds’ finances and master plan, noting the property produces a mix of property-tax support and event rental income while the county retains ownership of the facility and the fair board is legally charged with staging the fair.
County presenters said rental income is limited — about $39,000 annually from facility rentals under the current rates — and that some users pay token-based charges for electricity and other services. Commissioners and staff described a tension between keeping rates low to serve the public and raising them to better cover operating and capital costs.
The county noted impact fees and other restricted sources could be used for a new building at the fairgrounds but that the impact fees collected so far accumulate slowly. Under the new fee structure the county collected about $88,000 last year in the relevant impact-fee account, officials said; staff cautioned that those funds alone would take time to fund major construction. Officials also said the fairgrounds expansion is planned in multiple phases and the particular building discussed was not in the first phase of that expansion.
Speakers emphasized that the fairgrounds operates partly like an enterprise fund — generating some revenue for its operations — but that the county still subsidizes it and must balance public-service goals against maximizing revenue.
County staff pointed commissioners to the fair board’s master plan, which staff and at least one commissioner described as thorough, and said additional revenue or different financing sources will be needed to implement building improvements in a timely way.
The discussion did not include a formal vote or staff direction to adopt a financing plan; commissioners asked staff to continue analysis and to return with more detail on how impact fees, ARPA funds or other sources could be combined to support construction.
