Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Select Board approves Ares engineering study for transfer station; committee asked to stay engaged

5541458 · April 11, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Select Board approved a scope and contract with Ares (engineering) for a study of the transfer station. Committee members expressed concern they had not been consulted on scope additions; board said the committee will be kept involved as the study proceeds.

The Select Board voted to accept a scope of work and contract with an engineering firm for a transfer-station study. The contract and scope (dated Feb. 10 in committee correspondence) were discussed at length by Solid Waste Committee members and the board.

Scope and procurement: Select Board materials list tasks the engineering firm will perform for the transfer station evaluation; committee members said portions of the scope reflected prior committee discussion and added items to examine whether some improvements could be performed at the existing site. One committee member asked whether the committee would be included in determining the scope; board members said committee input had been reflected in the scope and that firm staff would be available to the committee.

Cost and contract approval: Presenters noted the firm’s scope-of-work price at $6,000. A Solid Waste Committee member said he was surprised that so much work could be done for that cost: “If they can do all this for $6,000, I’m surprised,” he said. The board treated the Ares engagement as a contract requiring a motion. A board member moved to accept the contract for the study at the transfer station; the motion was seconded and the board approved the contract. One board member said he would send the signed scope to the engineering contact and the firm would begin work promptly.

Why it matters: The study aims to evaluate options for the existing transfer-station site and the proposed new facility, including salt-shed and recycling-building evaluations and site organization; findings could guide future capital decisions and funding requests.

Board direction and committee involvement: Board members said the Solid Waste Committee will be involved as the study progresses and that the firm historically provides the required deliverables. The board asked staff to forward the scope and supporting materials to committee members and to ensure the transfer-station representative is included in future committee discussions.