Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Impervious Surface topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission debates impervious-surface definition, seeks stronger low-impact development standards and maintenance requirements
Summary
Planning staff and commissioners discussed whether clean gravel and engineered infiltration features should count as impervious surface, and stressed the need for engineered designs and maintenance schedules for LID credits.
Get email alerts on the Impervious Surface topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Winchester Planning and Zoning Commission discussed clarifying its impervious-surface definition and how low-impact development (LID) measures should be treated in coverage calculations.
Planning staff said the commission has encountered instances where gravel used for driveways, walkways, infiltration strips and engineered rain‑garden systems was being counted as impervious surface by some reviewers, particularly when gravel is compacted or improperly constructed. Staff recommended clarifying that clean, well‑engineered gravel systems used for infiltration should be treated differently than ‘‘process gravel’’ or compacted surfaces that function like pavement.
Commissioners and staff agreed on two principles: first, features intended and designed to infiltrate water (for example, properly engineered infiltration galleries and LID facilities) should be eligible for credit only if they are engineered and sized appropriately; second, regular maintenance and an enforceable maintenance schedule should be a condition of any approval that grants an impervious‑coverage credit for LID features.
The commission asked staff to review the Highland Lake District regulations and the town’s LID provisions, confirm whether existing regulations already require engineered designs and maintenance schedules, and return with suggested regulatory edits or guidance for consistent plan review. Staff noted wetlands review and enforcement practices can influence outcomes and recommended clearer coordination and consistent conditioning from wetlands recommendations to Planning & Zoning decisions.
Ending: Staff will analyze the definitions and LID language, and bring a proposed regulatory clarification or checklist back to the commission for review; commissioners said the change is likely to focus on implementation and enforcement rather than wholesale changes to impervious definitions.

