Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pole Attachments Law Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill requiring pole‑attachment agreements for law enforcement cameras after debate over privacy and security
Summary
House Bill 2109, which would require public utilities to enter pole‑attachment agreements with law enforcement on request and include indemnity language, passed the committee by voice vote after a floor‑bound motion. Members debated public safety benefits and cybersecurity/privacy risks before advancing the bill to the floor.
Committee staff described House Bill 2109 as a measure that would require public utilities to enter pole‑attachment agreements with law enforcement agencies upon request and to include specified terms, including indemnification and defense language for utilities.
Nick (committee staff) summarized the bill and said it prescribes requirements for pole attachments and an obligation that utilities indemnify and hold harmless public utilities from actions related to attachments.
Representative Miss Neiber moved the bill out of committee favorably for passage; Representative Holheisel seconded the motion. The committee chair called for the ayes, members voiced support and the motion passed; Representative Carmichael recorded his opposition on the record and asked for it to be noted. Representatives Penn and Smith asked to have their yes votes recorded.
During floor discussion, Representative Carmichael said he opposed the legislation because of cybersecurity and privacy concerns, citing past incidents in which law enforcement access systems were misused and concerns that camera systems and data had not been adequately secured. "Law enforcement has failed to secure those cameras and the data that arise therefrom," Carmichael said, and he said the committee should require stronger security and accountability.
Other members, including Representative Penn and Representative Naber, argued that the technology is an important tool for public safety, citing cases in which automated license‑plate readers and cameras assisted criminal investigations and child‑safety searches. Supporters said safeguards exist and misuses led to discipline in at least one cited example. Representative Penn said the tool had direct relevance to his family’s safety during targeted threats he experienced.
The motion to advance HB 2109 passed and the bill will go to the House floor for further consideration. Committee members debated privacy, oversight and required security safeguards during the discussion. The committee did not adopt amendments at the meeting and did not specify a subsequent committee deadline in the record.
