Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Code Amendment Mixed Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff proposes zoning amendment to allow residential uses in U4 commercial corridor; commission asked for input
Summary
City staff presented a preliminary draft amendment to Euclid's zoning code (Section 13.59.03) to recognize and regulate mixed-use development — including residential uses in U4 local retail/wholesale districts — and asked the Planning and Zoning Commission for feedback on scope and conditional-use standards.
City planning staff presented a preliminary proposal to amend Section 13.59.03 of the Euclid codified ordinances to add residential activity as an allowed or conditional use in the U4 local retail and wholesale district and to establish design and oversight standards for mixed-use development along several commercial corridors.
Staff said the amendment aims to acknowledge existing legally nonconforming residential uses in commercial corridors and to create intentional standards for design, pedestrian circulation, bicycle amenities and other planning elements to encourage adaptive reuse and reinvestment. Staff pointed commissioners to a draft code amendment distributed at the meeting and asked members to evaluate whether the proposed conditional-use standards achieve an appropriate balance between flexibility and oversight.
The staff presentation listed several corridors as examples of areas under consideration for the change, noted these corridors already contain nonconforming residential units, and said the amendment could be refined or extended through an overlay district if warranted. "Mixed use development is a planning strategy that encourages a blend of residential, commercial, cultural, and institutional uses within the same area or structure," staff said, arguing the approach can foster walkable, economically resilient neighborhoods and help revitalize underused commercial properties.
No formal vote was taken; staff requested the commission review the draft and provide informal comments about the scope and standards. Commissioners were invited to consider whether additional tailored approaches (artist studios, maker spaces, live-work units) should be included or whether the concept should apply to additional corridors beyond those listed.
Staff emphasized that the item was for review only and that no code change or formal action would occur at the meeting without further deliberation and public notice.
