Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Concern Rezoning Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge commissioners to honor comprehensive plan and increase transparency on large rezoning proposals
Summary
Residents at the May 13 meeting urged elected officials to respect the county comprehensive plan's intensive agriculture designation for roughly 1,050–1,057 acres and called for more open meetings and scrutiny of dewatering permits and executive sessions tied to industrial development.
Several residents used the public-comment period at the May 13 St. Joseph County Board of Commissioners meeting to urge commissioners and county council members to respect the county comprehensive plan and to increase transparency around recent development activity.
Dan Caruso of New Carlisle addressed commissioners about county council Bill 42-25, a first-reading rezoning he said would affect about "a thousand and approximately 50 acres" north of U.S. 20. Caruso asked county leaders to "listen to the people" and said the comprehensive plan designates the area as intensive agriculture. He warned industrial conversion could "deplete our water" and asked that any new land buyers agree to local covenants.
Steve Francis questioned whether a recent meeting that included a quorum of two decision-making bodies complied with Indiana's Open Door law. Francis said he is researching the matter and urged the county to hold such deliberations in public to avoid suspicion and "innuendo." He said related rezoning and data-center decisions are pending before the council and commissioners.
Mary Fincherman of New Carlisle also cited the comprehensive plan and a recent drainage-board discussion, saying she was concerned that previous drainage analysis indicated withdrawals beyond what is considered a safe limit for the aquifer. Fincherman said she opposed conversion of the identified acreage and urged officials to refresh their review of the comprehensive plan before votes.
County staff responded during public comment that an earlier drainage-board filing for a dewatering permit included errors; the county said it has started work to correct that filing and will return it to the drainage board in amended form.
The public comments did not prompt an immediate policy change or motion by the commissioners at the May 13 meeting; they were taken as input for future council and commission consideration.
