Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parole Revocation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Parole revoked for Cynthia Manshag after multiple out‑of‑parish arrests and outstanding warrants

5481031 · April 30, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Cynthia Manshag (recorded as Cynthia Sue Manchaca) had parole revoked after the board found she had multiple out-of-parish arrests, outstanding warrants (including a Texas detainer) and had failed to maintain supervision obligations; the panel voted unanimously to revoke.

The Committee on Parole revoked the parole of Cynthia Manshag (recorded in documents as Cynthia C. Manchaca, DOC 370145) after a hearing where the board reviewed multiple out-of-parish charges, bond forfeiture notices from Harrison County, Texas, and theft convictions in Louisiana.

Board members explained the revocation followed a pattern of moving without permission, out‑of‑state detainers and a guilty plea to misdemeanor theft for which a parish sentence and credit for time served were recorded.

At the hearing the panel reviewed an array of allegations and records: a Harrison County, Texas, bond forfeiture and detainer tied to a burglary-of-building charge (December 8, date cited in the record); two warrants from Bossier City for theft; an arrest by DeSoto Parish in September followed by transport to a Bossier facility with a later guilty plea to misdemeanor theft (sentence: six months parish jail with credit for time served). Manshag acknowledged she had been in Texas briefly and said she had been connected to a partner who was arrested; she told the board she returned to Louisiana and had been incarcerated since February 2023. The panel also noted she reported being unemployed and currently owing $943 in supervision arrears.

The board voted to revoke parole, citing repeated violations including unauthorized moves, out‑of‑state arrests and failure to meet supervision requirements. Panel members recorded concurrence and closed the hearing with instructions about revocation procedures and the parolee’s next steps in custody.