Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parole Revocation Domestic Violence topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parole revoked for Thaddeus Harrell after victim testimony, protective order and restitution noted
Summary
The parole board revoked Thaddeus Harrell (also referenced as Howell/Harrell in the record) following testimony from a victim who described being shoved, strangled and concussed; the hearing noted a court-ordered restitution of $2,350 and a protective order through March 26.
The Committee on Parole revoked the parole of Thaddeus Harrell after a hearing at Morehouse Parish (the hearing record alternately names him "Harrell"). The board cited a victims detailed account of the incident, medical treatment documented as a concussion, a court-ordered restitution amount of $2,350 and an active protective order when voting to revoke.
The victim, who identified herself and described being shoved into a bathroom door, said she required emergency care and later documented a concussion and medical bills. "Mister Harrell was was told not to come to the hospital on the date in question...When I walked in the room, I spoke to everybody...He took my Stanley cup out of my hand...my head. He had done shoved my head into that bathroom door, and I'm hanging on for dear life," she said in extensive testimony. Board members noted the medical record and protective order and voted to revoke. "My vote is to revoke," Mr. Tillis said; the panel concurred.
Why it matters: The board relied on victim testimony, emergency-room treatment and court orders (protective order and restitution) as the evidentiary basis to revoke, illustrating how both medical documentation and civil orders can factor into parole decisions.
Key details: The victim told the board she sustained a concussion and had $2,350 in emergency-room charges for which restitution was later ordered. The hearing record shows a protective order covering Harrell and members cautioned him to avoid the victim and her family; the board recorded restitution and the protective order as factors in its decision to revoke parole.
Discussion versus action: The record contains extended victim testimony and a detailed exchange about injuries and restitution (discussion). The formal action was a unanimous vote to revoke parole (decision). The board instructed the parolee to stay away from the victim and noted the protective order on the record.
Ending: The board revoked Harrells parole and closed the hearing; the transcript did not specify placement or a new eligibility date on the record.
