Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Utilities Water Sewer topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents, council spar over sharp water and sewer rate increases and public notice
Summary
Multiple Crown Point residents urged clearer notice and relief options after recent water and sewer rate increases discussed at the May 5 city council meeting; councilors and staff said the increases reflect past planning, regulatory orders and outside supplier price spikes.
Get email alerts on the Utilities Water Sewer topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Several Crown Point residents told the City Council on May 5 that recent water and sewer rate increases were poorly communicated and will cause financial hardship for seniors and fixed‑income households.
The most pointed comments came during the public comment period, where Bill Banham, 1275 West 96th Court, said his combined water and sewer bill rose about 52% and asked why the city had not pursued alternatives such as bonding. "My bill went up 52% if you count the 2 together," Banham told the council. He said some neighbors on fixed incomes face severe hardship and asked what the council would do to help them.
The concerns reflect two separate drivers the council described: (1) higher wholesale water charges from the region and (2) multi‑year sewer projects, including a new wastewater treatment plant and a downtown interceptor project. A city official told the meeting a scheduled additional sewer charge would be "$13.05" calculated on a 3,000‑gallon baseline; officials said final impacts depend on household use.
Why it matters: residents said they only learned of the increases after receiving their bills and through media or social posts, limiting time for public input. Elizabeth (719 West Juliet Street) summed that frustration: "Where am I getting this information, except for my bill that just arrived this weekend?" She urged the city to put clearer notices in utility bills and on the website.
Council and staff responses
City officials said the wastewater work has been in planning for several years and the existing Maryville Road plant reached capacity in 2018, requiring a new facility and relief projects. A council member explained the council and engineers began planning "about 7 years ago," and said some costs stem from complying with a judicial order related to the combined sanitary/storm system. Officials also noted the city buys water from an outside supplier and has limited control over wholesale increases.
On outreach, staff agreed to explore adding a notice to upcoming utility bills about pending rate changes and pointed members to the ordinance posted online that contains the schedule for future increases.
Discussion vs. action
No formal action was taken at the meeting to change rates. Several residents asked whether the city could use bonds or reduce future rates if new development or impact fees bring in additional revenue; council members said bonding would shift debt to the municipality and could raise taxes or fees later. Staff and council agreed to follow up with callers and provide more information on the ordinance and assistance options.
Community impact and next steps
Residents asked the council to consider targeted relief for seniors and low‑income households and for clearer, proactive public notices. Staff offered to follow up individually with concerned residents and to explore placing a bill insert or footer noting upcoming rate changes. The council did not set a deadline for further policy work at this meeting.

