Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Muncie council rejects rezoning request for Williamsburg Boulevard after sustained neighborhood opposition

5461962 · February 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council voted 9-0 to reject Ordinance 4-25, a proposal to rezone a parcel on West Williamsburg Boulevard to Variety Business. Residents and neighborhood leaders cited traffic, light pollution, property-value and safety concerns.

The Muncie Common Council on Feb. 3 rejected, by a 9-0 vote, Ordinance 4-25, a proposed rezoning that would have changed a parcel on West Williamsburg Boulevard from residential to Variety Business (BV).

Residents from multiple neighborhood associations urged the council to deny the request, saying a hotel and gas station — uses listed in the applicant’s submission — would harm the quiet, primarily single-story neighborhoods bordering the site.

Why it matters: Council members and neighbors said the rezoning would permit a broad set of commercial uses that are not compatible with the immediate residential area and would likely increase traffic, noise and light at property lines.

Multiple neighbors delivered prepared testimony. Jim Lowe, who said his property is adjacent to the parcel, reviewed a history of prior zoning requests and warned that BV zoning “allows liquor stores, taverns, television towers, adult entertainment, adult bookstores, shooting galleries, and a gas station,” and that once rezoned, “anything listed under variety business can be built.” Lowe urged the council to consider long-term neighborhood impacts on safety and property values.

Carrie Milliner, president of the Eagle’s Nest Association, said many residents are elderly and that a four-story hotel behind one-story condominiums “would overshadow our properties, diminish our pride, as well as our property values, and fundamentally alter the character of our neighborhood.”

Connie Weigant read a prepared statement citing health and wildlife concerns; she argued that light pollution from a large illuminated site could disrupt sleep and local wildlife, including a family of deer that routinely moves through the neighborhood.

Charles Tuitt, president of the Robinwood neighborhood organization, highlighted traffic safety at the nearby Morrison–Williamsburg intersection and asked council members to “imagine 25 feet from your back door you’ve got all this activity going on, all these lights, all the traffic.”

At the Planning Commission, the change carried an unfavorable recommendation; Planning Commission member Kylene Swackhammer noted the agenda incorrectly listed the site as R4 and that it is actually R2. The applicant asked for a continuance at council to prepare additional documentation but the Planning Commission’s unfavorable 7-0 recommendation and intense neighborhood opposition framed the discussion.

Several council members said protecting neighborhoods was a priority. Councilwoman Selby said the council is welcoming to business but said “protecting our neighborhoods and what they look like is more important to us.” Councilman McIntosh urged developers to consider other parts of Muncie that are better suited for commercial development.

The ordinance was introduced earlier in the meeting and, after public comment and discussion, the council rejected Ordinance 4-25 by voice/roll call with a recorded 9-0 vote.

Ending: The council’s rejection leaves the parcel at its current residential zoning and signals strong neighborhood influence on land-use decisions for this area of Williamsburg Boulevard.