Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personnel Compensation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves move to merit-based pay for non-represented city employees

5438544 · April 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council adopted resolution 3974, replacing step increases for non-represented employees with a merit-based salary-range system tied to annual CPI-W adjustments and adjusting ranges for several senior positions.

The Baker City Council on April 8 approved resolution 3974 to replace step-based pay increases for non-represented employees with a merit-based salary-range system and to adjust several job ranges.

Staff described the proposal as a shift from steps to a salary-range structure with yearly adjustments tied to the prior year's Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W). "We're proposing resolution 3974 to move away from step increases and move to a paid form of merit based policy with a salary range," the presenting staff member said. The staff member added that the recommended annual CPI-W increase for the coming year is 2.7 percent.

The resolution also includes targeted range increases for the finance director, fire chief and police chief positions, a change staff said was intended to bring those pay ranges closer to peer cities and to avoid compression that discourages internal promotion. Other changes described were reclassifying a data-analyst/management-assistant position into a union-covered role, removing an eliminated fire training captain hourly line, adding a tenant position and a community development coordinator role, and renaming the public safety officer manager to office manager.

Council discussion touched on sustainability and fairness. One councilor questioned whether moving to merit-based increases while asking residents for a small public-safety fee was disingenuous given potential future union-negotiated increases. Staff replied that union contracts remain separate and that the merit approach was designed to preserve flexibility and to avoid the kind of long-term compression that had previously left supervisors underpaid relative to subordinates.

Councilor Dilshid moved the motion and Councilor Cole seconded. The motion carried with no recorded opposition.