Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Committee Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hammond City gaming advisory committee adjourns; will resume work session to continue reviewing applications
Summary
The Hammond City Gaming Advisory Committee held a short public meeting, confirmed it has made no final decisions on applications, and voted to adjourn; members said they will return to a work session to continue application review.
The Hammond City Gaming Advisory Committee met briefly and adjourned after confirming it had made no final decisions and would return to a work session to continue reviewing applications.
A committee member (unnamed), speaking for the meeting, said, "As a report, the committee has not made any final decisions at this time. We did vote the meeting started at 04:07PM for work session. We voted to recess that meeting at 05:00 to attend this meeting. The intent of the committee is after this meeting to go back into work session, so we can continue to progress on the applications." The committee then moved to adjourn; the motion was seconded and the members present voted to adjourn.
Why it matters: the advisory committee is the local forum for reviewing gaming-related applications and making recommendations; resuming the work session indicates the panel is continuing its application evaluations rather than issuing final determinations at this public meeting.
Roll call indicated the following members were present: Alexander Zulno; Dabberton; Dorsey; Edwards; Farrell; Roberts; Salinas; Zany; Venez; and Miller. No final votes on applications or substantive policy decisions were recorded during the public portion of the meeting.
The meeting record shows three procedural actions: the committee recorded that a work session began at 4:07 p.m., that the work session was recessed at 5:00 p.m. so members could attend the public meeting, and that the public meeting was adjourned after a motion and second and an affirmative voice vote. The transcript did not identify specific makers or seconders for the procedural votes, nor did it record a roll-call tally for the adjournment vote.
Next steps: committee members said they will return to the previously convened work session after the public meeting to continue work on the pending applications. No dates, applicant names, application types, funding amounts, or deadlines were specified in the public transcript.
The public meeting concluded with a voice vote and the statement, "This concludes the public meeting."
