Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Health Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Vidor ISD board approves opt-in human development presentations for grades 6–8
Summary
The Vidor ISD Board adopted a SHAC recommendation to offer three opt-in human development presentations to students in grades 6–8. The program will be provided as parent-approved, opt-in presentations and funded this year in part by grant money; the board voted 4-0 to approve the recommendation.
VIDOR, Texas — At a March 24 special meeting, the Vidor Independent School District Board of Trustees voted 4-0 to adopt a School Health Advisory Council (SHAC) recommendation to offer human development presentations for sixth through eighth grades.
The SHAC leader, Teresa Harvin, presented three vendor programs recommended for the district: Determine to Succeed (grade 6), Freedom to Succeed (grade 7) and Aim for Success (grade 8). According to the SHAC presentation, each program runs about 45 to 60 minutes and costs roughly $4,000 per presentation, depending on travel and the number of on-campus sessions. The board adopted the recommendation in a motion by Trustee Camp, seconded by Trustee White.
Why it matters: Texas law requires districts to provide human development instruction; the SHAC told trustees the recommended approach standardizes presentation content and reduces the burden on campus teachers, counselors and nurses to prepare material. The SHAC emphasized the programs are opt-in: parents must preview the material and sign permission for their child to participate.
Parent preview and opt-in process: presenters said the vendor will provide a parent preview session that targets the more sensitive parts of the program; parents then can sign permission slips allowing children to attend, or choose to review the material at home. The SHAC reported prior parent preview attendance has been low in past offerings; this year the committee said grant funding is available to pay for the presentations but warned the district would need to identify recurring funding if it continues the program annually.
Content and committee review: the SHAC reported it reviewed curriculum against required TEKS (Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills) and said the programs address sensitive topics including sexting and sexual risks for older grades. The committee recommended carrying out the presentations before the end of the school year in May if the board approves implementation this year.
Board action and housekeeping: Trustee Camp moved to approve the SHAC recommendation and Trustee White seconded. The board then voted 4-0 with three trustees absent. The board separately approved the SHAC’s annual written report and the SHAC membership list for 2025–26 by the same margin, with Trustee Camp moving both and Trustee Benson seconding on the membership vote.
What was not decided: the board approved the recommendation to offer the presentations but did not adopt a multi-year funding plan; the SHAC asked trustees to consider whether to continue all three grades annually or to target fewer grades if recurring funding is not allocated.
Sources and attribution: the summary and quotes above rely on the SHAC presentation to the board (presenter identified as Teresa Harvin) and on the board’s recorded motions and votes at the March 24 meeting.
