Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tourism Byway Signage topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County committee discusses Harriet Tubman Scenic Byway route, funding and billboard restrictions; votes to table

5402225 · April 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Columbia County tourism and supervisors discussed a proposed Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad Scenic Byway route through the county, questions about an early $5,000 invoice and a requested commitment not to install new commercial billboards along the corridor; the committee voted to table further action pending more information.

County tourism officials and the public-works committee discussed a proposed Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad Scenic Byway through parts of Columbia County and voted to table a draft county resolution while staff gather more details about route, signage and funding commitments.

Adam Miller (tourism) summarized the byway plan and the preliminary routing materials and said the route as currently mapped would enter the county at Germantown and use Route 9 into Hudson, noting the state’s preference to use existing memorial/highway designations where possible. Miller described tradeoffs that affected the mapped route and explained that marketing materials prepared by the byway group could still reference other communities (for example, Kinderhook) even if the official route follows Route 9. County staff and supervisors raised questions about an invoice the county received in the fall for $5,000 and about the program’s longer-term funding expectations. A committee member said the county had received an invoice but had declined to pay because the group could not provide details on how funds would be used; the staff member added that the county controller declined payment pending clearer documentation.

A recurring topic was a provision in the byway materials asking participating jurisdictions to commit not to install new, unrelated commercial billboards along the route. One supervisor said that could pose a local planning question because the county and towns already have existing billboard structures in some locations. Committee members asked for a more detailed route map and clarity on whether the county or towns would be asked to provide ongoing funding. After discussion the committee voted to table consideration and requested that staff obtain clearer information from the byway organizers, including a localized route map and explicit funding details before returning the item for consideration.

Why it matters: scenic-byway designation can affect tourism marketing, signage along state and county routes and local planning controls. The committee sought clarity about fiscal obligations and local land‑use impacts before making a formal commitment.

Next steps: staff will seek more detail at an upcoming state tourism conference and return with a local map, clearer funding explanation and the written terms of any requested county resolution.