Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pascack Valley board hears $67M preliminary budget, tax levy to rise about 3.4%
Summary
District staff presented the proposed 2025–26 budget with a roughly $67 million general fund and a proposed tax levy increase of about 3.4%; board members reviewed revenue sources, an upcoming $1.6 million capital HVAC project and shifts in special-education funding.
Get email alerts on the Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cynthia Kirk, assistant board administrator for the Pascack Valley Regional High School District, presented the district’s proposed 2025–26 budget on March 17 and said the district will submit a tentative budget to the County Office by March 19 and set a final budget for a board vote on April 28.
Kirk said total revenue for 2025–26 is projected at $69,902,245, with roughly 85% (about $59.6 million) coming from the local tax levy including debt service. She described the general fund as “approximately $67,000,000” and said the district is proposing a general fund tax levy of $57,582,399, a 3.42% increase from the current year. Including debt service, the total tax levy shown on district materials is $59,659,299, which the presentation said equals a 3.33% overall increase.
The presentation laid out the major revenue and expenditure drivers: a rise in health-insurance costs, utilities and special-education services; state and federal aid together comprise about 6% of revenues (approximately $3.9 million); the district plans to use roughly $2.6 million of fund balance; and tuition revenue (students sent by other districts) is budgeted at $767,000.
Kirk said salary and benefits dominate expenditures: $36.3 million for salaries and $10.3 million for employee benefits. Instructional regular programs were listed at about $19.5 million; tuition (out-of-district and county tech/academies) at $5.6 million; special-education instruction at $4.5 million; operations and maintenance about $6.7 million; transportation $3.7 million; and athletics about $2 million. Capital outlay was shown at $1.7 million, which includes a single capital project budgeted at $1,600,000 to replace the Pascack Valley High School media-center rooftop unit.
Kirk also described changes affecting the special-education budget. She said the district is taking a conservative approach because “the allowable costs for special ed are becoming less and less qualified for the extraordinary aid reimbursement,” and that projected extraordinary-aid reimbursement is decreasing for 2025–26.
The presentation included municipality-level tax impacts calculated under New Jersey’s statutory tax-sharing formula (based on taxable property wealth and student enrollment). Using the materials shown, the presentation gave example tax impacts for an average assessed home in each sending town: Hillsdale, Montvale, Rivervale and Woodcliff Lake, with per-year and per-month dollar increases as presented.
No formal motion or roll-call vote on the tentative budget is recorded in the transcript immediately following the presentation; Kirk’s slides and her stated calendar deadlines (submit tentative budget by March 19; final vote set for April 28) were the principal outcomes reported.
For context, board members had heard committee-level budget discussion earlier in the evening during the Finance Committee report and asked a few procedural questions after the presentation. The district will next submit the tentative budget to the County Office and return to the board for the final vote in late April.

