Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Enforcement Discipline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board issues sanctions in two default-dismissal cases and approves multiple agreed orders and dismissals
Summary
The board accepted staff recommendations in two SOAH default dismissals, imposing reprimands, fines and continuing-education requirements, and approved a slate of agreed orders, dismissals and medical-review dispositions across several cases.
At its April meeting the Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners accepted staff recommendations in two contested cases that had been administratively defaulted at the State Office of Administrative Hearings and approved multiple agreed orders and case dismissals.
Staff attorney Kristen Sabrow presented the two default-dismissal matters. In case CP21-217 (staff presentation transcript listed the case under that docket) the ALJ granted a default dismissal; staff recommended the board adopt the factual findings and penalty: a formal reprimand, a $1,000 administrative penalty and six hours of continuing education (three hours in internal medicine and three hours in critical care). The board moved, seconded and the motion carried.
In case CP23-231 (presented as a second SOAH default dismissal), staff recommended adoption of factual findings and the penalty: a formal reprimand, a $3,500 administrative penalty and six hours of continuing education (two hours each in feline diabetes, feline anemia and exotic felines). The board moved, seconded and approved the recommendation.
After executive session the board also approved a set of agreed orders and multiple dismissals from informal conference and staff/medical review panels. The board voted to approve all agreed orders presented at the meeting except for CP24-450, which was pulled from the consent slate and handled separately in executive session. The board likewise approved a number of dismissals recommended from informal conference and staff conference, with a small handful of cases set aside for executive session consideration.
Board members and staff noted the procedural posture of the two default matters: in each case the respondent did not appear at SOAH and the administrative law judge found staff had given adequate notice, allowing the default disposition. Sabrow read the factual allegations from the record before the board adopted the panel recommendations.
No individual member roll-call votes were read aloud in the transcript; motions were adopted by voice vote and recorded as “motion carries” in the meeting minutes.
The board did not create new policy in these items; the actions implement disciplinary recommendations from staff, the enforcement committee and informal conference panels. Orders and dismissal lists will be posted in the board’s public record per normal procedure.
