Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Local Government Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

City Council approves consent calendar including ordinance 6602; resort district funds tree maintenance

5110848 · January 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Anaheim City Council approved the consent calendar (items 1–22) including Ordinance No. 6,602 (Beach Boulevard zoning amendments). Council recorded registered no-votes, an abstention and a recusal on specific items; a separate vote approved tree maintenance funded by the Anaheim Resort Maintenance District.

Anaheim City Council on Jan. 28 approved its consent calendar covering items 1 through 22, including adoption of Ordinance No. 6,602 amending multiple zoning chapters and Beach Boulevard specific-plan provisions, and authorized a tree maintenance contract paid from the Anaheim Resort Maintenance District.

The consent calendar was moved and seconded and carried as presented. The clerk recorded that there were registered no votes noted by Councilmember Meeks and Councilmember Bacalva on item 21, an abstention on item 22 by Councilmember Bayless and a recusal on item 19 by Councilmember Leon. The clerk also read a statement finding that the ordinance was not subject to additional environmental documentation under CEQA guideline sections "15,060 one(three)" as quoted in the meeting record. The clerk recorded the remainder of the calendar as passing with seven ayes and no nays.

Councilmember Kurtz pulled item 9 for brief discussion. He asked whether the more-than-$1.5 million tree-maintenance contract would be paid from the general fund. City staff responded that funding for the tree maintenance is not from the general fund but from the Anaheim Resort Maintenance District, an assessment on property owners in the resort area. Kurtz moved item 9 and Councilmember Bayless seconded; the motion passed by a recorded vote of seven ayes.

The clerk then read the full text of agenda item 21, reflected in the record as Ordinance No. 6,602, described in the clerk’s language as: "an adoption of an ordinance to the City of Anaheim amending chapters 18.04, 18.08, 18.14, 18.36, 18.38, 18.92, 18.122, and adjustment number 10 to the Beach Boulevard specific plan number 2017-1 zoning and development standards" and noting the clerk’s statement on CEQA. The clerk’s readout recorded the previously noted individual no-votes/abstention/recusal and stated the vote as seven ayes for the remainder of the calendar.

No reportable action was announced from the closed session that preceded the meeting; the city attorney stated there was "no reportable action, Madam Mayor," as recorded in the meeting transcript. The council then moved to other business and adjourned until Feb. 4, 2025.

Ending: The council’s roll call and recorded notations on abstentions, recusals and registered no votes are included in the official minutes; the city clerk’s office posts the complete consent-resolution language and the ordinance text on the city website for the public record.