Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Immigration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Huntington Beach council declares city a non‑sanctuary city for immigration enforcement
Summary
The City Council voted unanimously to adopt a resolution declaring Huntington Beach a non‑sanctuary city, citing federal immigration statutes and local public‑safety concerns; the council said the measure preserves voluntary cooperation with federal authorities and does not create city liability for federal enforcement.
Mayor Pat Burns moved and the City Council voted unanimously to adopt a resolution declaring Huntington Beach a non‑sanctuary city for the prevention of crime.
The resolution, approved 7‑0, says the city will not prevent local officials from cooperating with federal immigration authorities and cites federal statutes the city attorney said permit voluntary cooperation. "Our primary job is to make our city as safe as possible," Mayor Pat Burns said in moving the resolution.
Nut graf: Council members and the city attorney framed the action as a public‑safety measure and a legal clarification that Huntington Beach may voluntarily share information and work with federal agencies. Supporters said state sanctuary policy hampers cooperation and could expose officers to legal jeopardy; opponents and many public commenters warned the move could harm trust between immigrant communities and local police.
City Attorney Michael E. Gates outlined federal law cited in the resolution and the council debate, saying federal immigration statutes (Title 8 U.S.C.) and related case law preempt local policies that would bar voluntary cooperation with federal authorities. Gates summarized federal prohibitions on harboring and the limits on state or local laws that block exchanges of information with federal immigration authorities.
Supporters on the dais said the resolution is intended to preserve Huntington Beach officials' ability to work with federal law enforcement. "Cooperation amongst these agencies serves society best," Councilmember Don Kennedy said. Councilmembers Tony Strickland, Casey McKeon, Gracie Vandermark, Don Kennedy, and others voiced similar support during the floor debate.
Public comment was sharply divided. Several speakers urged the council to reject the resolution, arguing sanctuary policies help build community trust and make policing more effective; other speakers strongly supported the resolution as necessary for public safety. The council did not direct staff to pursue or defend any particular litigation in the meeting minutes, but the city attorney discussed potential legal conflict between state law and federal immigration law during the debate.
Ending: The council approved the resolution by roll call (all seven members voting in favor). The item now stands as a city policy statement; how it will affect day‑to‑day operations will depend on future police department procedures and any subsequent legal developments.
