Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Military Hangar Duluth topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
National Guard asks $3 million for Duluth hangar design to keep 148th Fighter Wing mission viable
Summary
The Minnesota National Guard requested $3 million for hangar design at Duluth International Airport to modernize aging hangars for the 148th Fighter Wing and position the base to compete for federal MILCON funding for full construction.
Major General (Adjutant General) Sean Manky and agency staff told the Capital Investment Committee on Feb. 11 they seek $3 million in state design money to replace nearly 70-year-old hangars supporting the Duluth Air National Guard wing and help the site compete for future federal military construction funds.
The request is design-only; speakers said full construction would be pursued with federal MILCON funding after design and that the state-design investment is intended to keep Duluth competitive for next‑generation fighter basing decisions.
"The existing hangars are nearly 70 years old," the adjutant general said, describing water intrusion and other structural deficiencies. He said Duluth's fighter wing is a major local employer and that modernized hangars are a factor when the Air Force and Department of Defense determine beddown locations for new aircraft.
Committee members asked about the risk that aircraft missions could be moved after state investment and whether dual funding (state design plus federal MILCON for construction) is feasible. The adjutant general said Duluth's wing is manned above 100% of assigned strength and that the state-funded design would support competing for federal construction dollars; he said the intent is to secure federal MILCON to cover construction once design is complete.
Representative members asked for follow-up on the expected federal contribution and on how a state design investment would affect the wing's competitiveness. The adjutant general said the service will pursue federal funding for construction and treat the state request as the design step to leverage those federal dollars.
Ending: The committee did not act on the request at the Feb. 11 hearing; the agency offered to provide additional details about federal funding prospects and next steps for securing MILCON once design is complete.
