Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoo Veterinary Hospital topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Minnesota Zoo asks state for bonding for new veterinary hospital and deferred maintenance
Summary
The Minnesota Zoo asked the Capital Investment Committee for state bonding to build a new veterinary hospital and to fund campus asset preservation, citing an aging 1975 facility, ventilation problems, and the need to serve statewide partners.
John Frawley, director of the Minnesota Zoo, and Dr. Rivas, head of veterinary programs, told the Capital Investment Committee on Feb. 25 that the zoo needs a new veterinary hospital and additional asset-preservation funding to meet industry standards and serve partner veterinarians across Minnesota.
The zoo presented a bonding request of $17.675 million for the new hospital project and an asset-preservation request of about $3.8 million; the presenters said the full hospital project is estimated to cost roughly $30 million and that the zoo has privately raised about $9 million toward that total. John Frawley said the project has been under development for roughly five years and that state design funds previously covered initial work.
Dr. Rivas described the current veterinary building, first built in 1975, as “outdated” and said it lacks essential infrastructure required by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and veterinary industry standards. She told the committee the facility is not large enough or properly ventilated for current needs, that surgical and holding spaces are deteriorated and too small, and that the layout forces staff to work in unsafe conditions. “We have struggled with a high rate of surgical infections due to the improper ventilation,” Dr. Rivas said.
Frawley and Dr. Rivas described the new facility as a consolidated hospital and wellness center with a larger surgical suite, an indoor ambulance bay, improved animal holding and quarantine spaces, remote monitoring for shy animals, diagnostic equipment including CT capability, and teaching and conference space to host veterinary students and continuing-education programs. Frawley said the project is also designed to support human-health considerations for staff; he noted in the presentation that “the suicide rate in veterinarians is 4 or 5 percent higher than most occupations” and said the new design will address workplace ergonomics and staff well-being.
Committee members asked about funding sources, partnerships and timing. Frawley said a previous governor recommendation prioritized asset preservation over a capital project, and that the zoo was able to press the request before both relevant committees. He told Representative Allen and others that the zoo partners with the University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine and with professional groups such as the Minnesota Veterinary Association for residencies, student rotations and continuing education; Dr. Rivas said the zoo now retains more in-house expertise, while still referring some cases to the university on a case-by-case basis. When asked what a further delay would mean, Frawley said the current facility forces the staff to do procedures in suboptimal conditions and that timing is “urgent,” noting construction would take roughly a year and a half once funded.
The presenters described broader campus needs beyond the hospital, including a failed boiler that required an $850,000 emergency repair and a longer deferred-maintenance list the zoo estimates at several million dollars. The zoo did not receive a committee vote on the request during the Feb. 25 hearing.
Votes or formal committee action on the zoo's request were not recorded; committee members were advised to follow up offline with staff and agency representatives.
