Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Princeton zoning board approves four routine resolutions
Summary
The Princeton Zoning Board of Adjustment approved four previously circulated resolutions in a consent-style set of votes at its April 23 meeting.
Get email alerts on the Board Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Princeton Zoning Board of Adjustment approved four resolutions that were circulated to members and posted to the municipal website prior to the April 23 meeting.
The resolutions — covering cases listed on the board’s agenda — were adopted by roll call votes with no substantive public discussion during the meeting. The board’s chair said the resolutions had been emailed and posted in advance and invited a motion in each instance prior to the unanimous roll calls.
Votes at a glance - Case Z24-579, 17 Madison Avenue (Block 28.03, Lot 53, R-4B zone) — Approved. Vote recorded as: Miss Colson (yes); Mister Floyd (yes); Mister Stein (yes); Joe McCowan (yes). (Motion and second on the record; no public comment.) - Case Z22-295, 13 Prospect Avenue (Block 49.01/2.01, E-2B zone) — Approved after board staff noted a revised draft; vote recorded as: Miss Colson (yes); Mister Floyd (yes); Mister Stein (yes); Chairman Cohen (yes). The resolution clarifies that the applicant is not seeking new parking spaces or changes to driveway/trash/retaining wall elevations at this time and lists limited conditions tied to third-party approvals and historic-preservation compliance. - Case Z24-595, 79 Prospect Avenue (Block 50.01, Lot 4, E-2B zone) — Approved. Vote recorded as: Miss Colson (yes); Mister Floyd (yes); Mister Stein (yes); Chairman Cohen (yes). - Case Z24-481, 650 Great Road (Block 8501, Lots 1011.0120.011112, E-4T zone) — Approved. Vote recorded as: Miss Paulson (yes); Mister Stein (yes); Chairman Cohen (yes).
All of the above resolutions were available to the public on the municipal website and were the subject of routine roll-call approvals; no speakers or public commenters were recorded for these items during the meeting.
The board moved on after the votes to the evening’s contested applications.

