Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Meeting Rules Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission removes general public‑comment period from its bylaws after debate
Summary
After extended discussion about meeting procedure and public engagement, the Jefferson County Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6–1 to delete the "citizens to be heard" / public‑comment section from its bylaws and future agendas, citing concerns about off‑topic testimony and process integrity.
The Jefferson County Planning and Zoning Commission voted to remove the general public‑comment segment commonly called "citizens to be heard" from its bylaws and meeting agendas. The motion to delete the public‑comment section (article references within the bylaws) passed 6–1, meeting the two‑thirds threshold required to amend the bylaws.
Commissioners and county counsel debated whether general public comment should appear at the beginning or end of meetings and how to structure it. Supporters of deletion said unsworn or off‑topic comments can confuse or prejudice specific applications before the commission and referenced previous meetings in which off‑topic testimony diverted the proceeding. Opponents favored retaining a limited, structured public comment slot at the end of the agenda to give residents an opportunity to raise general planning matters that are not part of a live public hearing.
County legal counsel advised that the commission controls its agenda and that the choice to include or remove a public‑comment segment is within the commission’s discretion. Counsel also warned that the chair’s authority to limit or suspend comments carries reputational risk if used frequently: "These are your meetings. These are not the public's meetings. They're your meetings that happen to go on in public," counsel said while noting the need for clear, objective rules if the commission chooses to continue public comment.
Motion and vote: Commissioner Sparks moved to delete the public‑comment language (citizens to be heard/public comment) from the bylaws (including the related subsection on page 3). Commissioner Husky seconded; roll call produced six votes in favor and one opposed, satisfying the two‑thirds requirement to amend the bylaws.
Ending: Commissioners directed staff to update the bylaws text and meeting agendas to reflect the change. The commission retained other procedural limits (speaker time limits for public hearings and sworn testimony) and discussed improved orientation and training for new commissioners.
