Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appointments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates advice-and-consent process for county commission appointments; counsel to prepare options
Summary
Councilmembers discussed how the council should exercise advice and consent for executive appointments to county commissions. Members recommended clearer rules, a possible council order to govern the process, and asked the county counselor to prepare guidance and a memo on executive vs. legislative roles.
Council members discussed how to handle advice-and-consent reviews of county commission and board nominees, with several members urging a clearer, council-led process that avoids discouraging qualified applicants.
Councilman Brown said the council has latitude to define how it conducts advice-and-consent because once the executive forwards a nomination the council's role is to approve or reject. He described a low-friction approach he has used informally—sending a brief email invitation to nominees for a short conversation—so the council can ask questions without staging a formal hearing. "If you don't wanna talk to me and I can't learn about you, then I may not be able to support you," Brown said.
Other councilmembers said they want a standardized, transparent approach but cautioned against creating a process that would feel like an "inquisition" and deter strong candidates. Suggestions included a written questionnaire, a short scripted interview with a small set of consistent questions, or a rules-of-procedure order that defines council practice for advice-and-consent reviews.
County staff said historically the executive handled escrow and appointment administrative details and that the council's rules could be clarified. Council members discussed whether advice-and-consent procedures could be adopted as a legislative order (which would be internal to the council and not signed by the executive) rather than a resolution and asked the county counselor to prepare written guidance. The counselor's office agreed to resurrect a previously used memo explaining delineation of legislative and executive duties for appointments and to add clarifying language about possible council processes.
Why it matters: The council's approach to advice and consent affects recruitment and vetting of public-board and commission members for planning, code, and other duties that shape development and county services.
Ending: The county counselor will draft guidance and circulate a memo to the council and county executive describing what the council can adopt by order and possible interview or questionnaire approaches; the rules committee will review options.
