Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation Mobility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates East–West connector, corridor investment and MoDOT coordination
Summary
Jefferson County Ad Hoc Committee reviewed transportation and mobility chapters in the draft master plan, discussing corridor priorities, coordination with MoDOT and East West Gateway, safety measures including J‑turns, flooding on key routes and trade-offs of investing county resources in state highways.
The Jefferson County Ad Hoc Committee spent substantial time reviewing the transportation and mobility chapter of the draft master plan. Members discussed prioritizing corridor improvements, coordinating with the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) and the East West Gateway Council of Governments, and the county’s role in supporting projects on state highways.
Committee members raised safety measures used elsewhere — notably J‑turns and intersection treatments — and cited local examples where similar investments reduced crashes. Several members said “investing” in state-owned corridors should be clarified: investment could mean county dollars, technical support, advocacy, or pursuing matching funds through East West Gateway rather than direct construction spending.
The draft calls for a roadway-safety implementation team and references the county’s 2021 road‑safety plan. Members asked for clarity on who would staff a safety team and whether it would duplicate existing road committees. Flooding along certain connector routes (noted examples on route 6167/Jeffco Boulevard and near Kohler City) also came up as a priority for mitigation planning because seasonal floods can cut regional bypasses.
The committee discussed the East–West connector as a long‑term item, noting it would likely require right‑of‑way preservation and multi‑jurisdictional coordination. Members said prior studies should be collected for review and recommended public outreach to build support before pursuing expensive corridor studies. The committee agreed that regular, active engagement with MoDOT and East West Gateway is necessary for programming federal and state funds and that increased citizen participation in regional meetings can raise a corridor’s chance of being funded.
Other items discussed: prioritizing pedestrian and bicycle connections where feasible, improving acceleration lanes and access for high‑speed corridors such as Highway 30 and 141, and targeting infrastructure improvements that support economic development while balancing community preferences.
