Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Collaboration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates municipal collaboration language; members suggest adding "municipalities that choose to participate"
Summary
Committee members raised concerns about wording that implies mandatory collaboration with municipalities, urged adding language to limit collaboration to municipalities that opt in, and questioned whether municipalities or the county should have authority over land-development approvals near municipal borders.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Collaboration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee members questioned draft language that says the county "should collaborate with municipalities in meeting plan implementation," urging that the sentence be changed to clarify that collaboration applies to municipalities that choose to participate.
Several members noted past tension with nearby municipalities — the meeting record includes a recollection that Arnold previously resisted county involvement — and said the plan should not imply the county can compel municipal action. One committee member proposed wording that would read "collaborate with municipalities that choose to participate in leading plan implementation." Another suggested the plan phrase be left as-is because the implication that collaboration must be voluntary is already inherent.
Committee members also discussed whether the county would coordinate review and approval of land development applications with municipalities. Staff and committee members observed municipalities frequently act independently on land development approvals and that collaboration may be limited to notification when projects abut municipal boundaries. The committee asked staff to clarify whether the phrases "reviewing and approving land development applications" should instead say simply "reviewing" or otherwise be reworded to avoid implying shared approval authority.
The group asked staff to add clarifying language about implementation partners and to note explicitly whether and how municipal participation would be voluntary.
