Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Discipline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Brandywine board reviews streamlined student code of conduct and seeks adoption of crisis response policy
Summary
District staff presented a revised code of conduct aligned with new state reporting guidance and asked the board to approve Crisis Response Policy 6.1; no formal board vote on the policy was recorded at the meeting.
Brandywine School District staff presented a substantially revised student code of conduct and asked the Board of Education to approve Crisis Response Policy 6.1 at the district's April meeting.
District presenters said the revisions align local offense codes with statewide reporting guidance from a legislator-led school climate task force and the school crimes reporting law. The proposed code reduces the number of listed offenses from about 100 to 45 and separates criminal charges from school disciplinary offenses to create more uniform definitions and consequences across buildings.
Staff explained several specific changes: profanity is now included under a broader definition of inappropriate language and gestures; teen dating violence is now a checkbox within the campus offenses; bullying and cyberbullying are consolidated under harassment; and level-4 assault has been redefined as "assault causing physical injury." New categories added to the matrix include "exposure," "other school crimes" (incidents that must be reported under the school crimes reporting law, including arson or manslaughter), and a broad "safety violation" definition for conduct that could endanger students or others.
Presenters said middle school students participated on the code committee for the first time and that student members raised concerns about the dress code. Students asked the district to revisit rules on outerwear, headwear (including cultural head wraps), and clothing with frayed edges or visible holes; the board was told any dress-code changes would follow stakeholder vetting and existing district processes.
Staff told the board that state regulations labeled "Regulation 6-14" and "Regulation 6-16" were still pending 30-day public comment and that some local language would be updated when those regulations are finalized. The presenter emphasized the committee's intent to make discipline outcomes more uniform across schools and described the matrix of corrective steps and interventions included in the board packet.
Superintendent Lawson and President Ackerman were named as having served on the legislator-led school climate task force used as part of the review. The presenter thanked committee members and noted that the code was reworked to match federal reporting categories and to reduce inconsistent application of consequences across buildings.
On Crisis Response Policy 6.1, staff said they had incorporated feedback from the board since the prior meeting and asked the board to approve the policy; the transcript does not record a vote on that adoption at this meeting.
Next steps outlined by staff included further edits tied to forthcoming state regulations, additional stakeholder review of dress-code proposals, and returning to the board for subsequent action when the final language is ready.
