Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Growth And Sewer topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident urges council to impose development moratorium citing long-standing sewer capacity problems
Summary
During public comment, Henry Bennett of Frankford urged Sussex County Council to impose a moratorium on new development until the county resolves sewer capacity issues and opposes a proposed East-West Beach Route project, saying the sewer system is at capacity and unregulated growth has damaged quality of life.
Henry Bennett of Frankford addressed the Sussex County Council during public comment on April 29 and urged the council to impose a moratorium on new development until the county resolves longstanding sewer-capacity problems.
Bennett introduced himself with his full name and address (Henry Bennett, 31442 Peachtree Lane, Frankford, Delaware) and said he and residents in the councilmembers' districts want immediate, "drastic restrictions and moratoriums on development" to preserve quality of life. He said the county sewer system has been at capacity for decades and described hauling and disposal of waste and recycling equipment problems as costly and unacceptable. He also urged the council to refrain from pursuing or supporting an East-West Beach Route, saying public opposition to that route has been longstanding.
Bennett's main points
- Sewer capacity: "The sewer system is and has been at capacity for decades," Bennett said, and he attributed the condition to long-term, "unregulated growth." He urged the council to focus on resolving sewer system limits before approving additional residential development.
- Moratorium request: Bennett said Councilmember Lloyd proposed a moratorium early in the term and urged council members to enact immediate moratoriums to prevent further burdens on utilities.
- Environmental and economic concerns: Bennett said unchecked sewage problems could harm beaches, marshes and tourism, depress property values and cost taxpayers, and asked council members to protect open space and farmland.
What the council did in response
Council did not take immediate formal action on the public-comment request during the meeting. The comment was recorded in the public record; several later agenda items and council discussion addressed sewer projects and contracts (see "Votes at a glance" article for actions taken during the same meeting). No motion or vote on a development moratorium was recorded in the April 29 meeting minutes.
Why it matters
Bennett's remarks highlight public concern about sewer capacity and growth management. Council-approved engineering contracts in the same meeting advance sewer repairs and expansions; the public comment signals constituency demand for more stringent growth controls or moratoria pending infrastructure improvements.
Quote
"Our sewer management is unacceptable, and it should rage everyone," Bennett said during his public comment, later calling for council members to "reflect, regulate and preserve what makes this place special." (Public comment; not a formal council action.)
