Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Animal Welfare topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Heated public dispute over Holtzville Ecology site care prompts multiple investigations and heavy public comment
Summary
Multiple former employees, animal-welfare advocates and current staff clashed at the Town of Brookhaven meeting over allegations of poor care at the Holtzville Ecology Center; town and federal inspectors have been asked to review the claims and the board said it will await agency findings.
Get email alerts on the Animal Welfare topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At the Town of Brookhaven meeting the Holtzville Ecology Center became the meeting’s most contested item: dozens of speakers addressed the board during public comment, with several former employees and Humane Long Island representatives alleging chronic neglect and inadequate veterinary care for animals at the facility, and multiple current employees, volunteers, union representatives and supporters mounting a robust defense.
Humane Long Island presented testimony collected from 9 former employees and circulated photos and videos alleging animal welfare concerns including inadequate enclosures, medical issues not being treated promptly, and specific cases where animals later died. John DeLeonardo of Humane Long Island told the board he represents former employees and that evidence and witness statements support a need for further scrutiny.
Current and former Holtzville staff, including the facility superintendent and longtime caretakers, and several town employees and volunteers, spoke in the facility’s defense. Staff said the center cares for many non-releasable, rescued and exotic animals, maintains permits with state and federal agencies, and provides regular veterinary oversight. A number of witnesses submitted written letters attesting to veterinary care, daily enrichment and compliance with inspections.
Town Supervisor Dan Panico said the town had received complaints and that regulatory agencies were involved; he told the audience that the USDA had conducted an unannounced inspection and found the allegations unfounded with respect to the claims submitted to that agency. The Town’s officials also said they have opened their own review and that multiple agencies will conduct or have conducted independent investigations.
Speakers on both sides urged the board to act: advocates for the animals called for immediate rehoming or placement at accredited sanctuaries for animals they said were suffering, while staff and supporters said relocation would be disruptive to animals that are “imprinted” on people and that the center provides lifelong care for non-releasable animals. Several former employees and wildlife rehabilitators described specific medical cases and urged transfer to specialized sanctuaries. Supporters warned the board that social-media messages had threatened staff and that many employees felt intimidated and had filed police reports; the Highway Department employees and union representatives publicly backed the ecology center staff.
The board did not vote on specific remedies at the meeting. Town officials said they will continue oversight reviews and encouraged formal complaints to regulatory agencies where appropriate. Supervisor Panico urged caution about online claims, noted that inspections and records will guide decisions, and promised to make agency findings public as they are completed.
Ending: The Holtzville Ecology issue remains an open matter for the town: the board, agency inspectors and independent actors will review documentary evidence, regulatory findings, and witness statements before the town reaches any formal determination on management changes or animal transfers.
