Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Lot Line Adjustment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves Farm / J&H properties lot‑line adjustment and two partial waivers
Summary
The Planning Board approved Application 25‑09 (Farm/J&H properties) with two partial waivers that allow use of plans and plan references of record for large rear parcel areas; the lot‑line adjustment transfers roughly 42 acres and results in Lot 6 becoming ~13.5 acres and Lot 7 gaining about 55 acres.
The Planning Board approved a lot‑line adjustment (Application 25‑09) between Farm and J&H Properties, accepting two waiver requests that allow partial omissions for the rear portions of very large parcels where plans of record and deed references establish the boundary locations.
Jonathan Crowdis of Hoyle Tanner presented the plan on behalf of the applicants and explained that the change would reconfigure Lot 6 into roughly 13.5 acres and expand Lot 7 by approximately 55 acres by moving a 1.3‑acre area and reorganizing several parcel lines. The board discussed the approach and confirmed that the submitted survey covers the area involved in the adjustment and that plan references on record were adequate for the back portion of the very large parcel.
The board voted to grant waiver request No. 1 (to not show every natural/man‑made feature on the rear portion of the large parcel under Section 14.4) and waiver request No. 2 (to permit approximate rather than exact property‑line locations in the rear portion where plans of record are relied on), each by motion and voice vote. After granting waivers, the board approved the lot‑line adjustment application without conditions, finding it complies with Loudon zoning and land‑development regulations as presented and with the waivers granted.
Motions: waiver 1 (made by Forrest Green, second Alicia Kingsbury) — approved; waiver 2 (made by Alicia Kingsbury, second Forrest Green) — approved; application approval (motion by Jeff Green, second Alicia Kingsbury) — approved by voice vote. The board recorded no additional conditions.
