Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Poughkeepsie council closes BID public hearing after resident urges 1–2 year review
Summary
During a March 18 public hearing on a proposed downtown Business Improvement District, a Ward 8 resident urged the Common Council to plan a formal evaluation of the BID’s successes and failures within one to two years; the council then closed the hearing by voice vote.
The Poughkeepsie Common Council closed a public hearing on a proposed downtown Business Improvement District (BID) on Tuesday, March 18, after a resident urged the council to commit to an early evaluation of the district.
Daniel Latona, a union member and community organizer who lives in Poughkeepsie’s Ward 8, addressed Mayor Flowers and the Common Council during the hearing and asked whether the city has “a plan to evaluate the successes and failures, pros and cons of the BID within 1 or 2 years of its implementation.”
Latona added that the council should continue to exercise oversight after policies are adopted to determine whether changes are needed. “A lot of ideas come through this city hall. The council should continue to use its oversight powers to evaluate these ideas after they are passed to see if they need changes,” he said.
Following public comment, an unnamed council member moved to close the public hearing; another council member seconded the motion. The council closed the hearing by voice vote, with those present responding “Aye.” The transcript does not record a roll-call tally for the motion or identify the mover and seconder by name.
The hearing was convened at 6:23 p.m. on March 18. The council’s roll call earlier in the meeting indicated multiple council members were present; the transcript includes spoken roll-call entries for Council member Henry, Council member Brown, Council member James, Council member Grant, Council member Clinton, Majority Leader Patterson Thompson, Vice Chair Shook and Chairman Wilson. The record supplied does not include further details about the proposed BID ordinance, its boundaries, funding mechanisms, or a timeline for implementation.
Latona’s request for an evaluation within one to two years is the only substantive policy recommendation recorded in the hearing segment. No formal direction to staff or a council resolution directing a post-implementation review was made on the record during the portion of the meeting provided.
